Test Drive: 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX

By: Josh Sadlier , Associate Editor www.edmunds.com

Vehicle Tested: 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX 2dr Coupe (2.4L 4cyl 5A)
Pros: Impressive handling, provocative styling, confident at high speeds, plentiful standard features, industry-leading warranty.
Cons: Stiff ride, mediocre acceleration given handling and ride quality, lackluster dashboard design.

The 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX is a rare mixed bag from Kia, a slick fashion statement that handles better than it needs to and doesn't go as fast as it should. Like fellow Korean giant Hyundai, Kia has churned out a series of remarkably competitive products as of late, not least the Forte SX sedan on which the Koup is based. Indeed, that sedan took down a similarly priced Mazda 3 i in one of our most lopsided comparison tests ever. The Koup, however, could use some fine-tuning.

For years now, the Honda Civic and Scion tC have been the only names worth mentioning among reasonably priced sedan-based two-doors. Enter the Forte Koup, which comes with a choice of two engines, just like its rivals (if you count the tC's dealer-installed supercharger option), but offers more head-turning style than both Japanese entrants put together.

But the stakes are higher for coupes than for sedans, whose buyers often want extra flair in return for surrendering practicality. The 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX has a nice body, but its 173-horsepower four is unchanged from the sedan, whereas the high-revving Civic Si and supercharged tC boast 200 hp apiece and consequently much friskier acceleration.

And while the Koup SX's suspension tuning is sportier than the already capable sedan's — yielding a marginally quicker slalom run — the everyday result is a significantly harsher ride. In the transition from sedan to coupe, what the Forte needed, if anything, was more power — not better handling.

Consumers cross-shopping the comfort-oriented Civic EX coupe and base tC likely will find the Koup SX's ride stiff, and those interested in the Civic Si or supercharged tC will be disappointed with the Kia's lackluster engine. If only those 173 horses could be transformed into 200, or that suspension tuning could be dialed back to the SX sedan's level. One or the other might help the 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX join Kia's ongoing hit parade.

  • 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX - Front

    The 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX doesn't lack for visual drama, even if the front styling is derivative of the Honda Civic.
    (photo by: Scott Jacobs)

  • 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX - Interior

    Like the sedan, the Forte Koup looks surprisingly generic inside for such a stylish car. It's not offensive, just...boring.
    (photo by: Scott Jacobs)

  • 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX - Rear

    The Forte Koup looks as good from the back as it does from the front. Kudos to Kia's stylists for taking some chances.
    (photo by: Scott Jacobs)

Performance

The front-wheel-drive 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX is powered by a 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine rated at 173 hp and 168 pound-feet of torque. Our test car had the optional five-speed automatic transmission; a six-speed manual is standard. At the test track, the Forte Koup SX hit 60 mph in 8.4 seconds en route to a 16.3-second quarter-mile at 85.8 mph.

That's more than a second slower to 60 than the Civic Si and supercharged Scion tC. The base Civic trails the Koup SX by a few ticks, while the base tC is comparable. Remarkably, the Forte Koup SX zipped through our slalom cones at 68.5 mph, which is 1.2 mph faster than the Forte SX sedan and just 0.3 mph behind the last Civic Si we tested. The tC, for the record, doesn't handle nearly as well.

In the real world, the 2.4-liter four supplies a forgettable soundtrack, but it feels capable, with a broad power band that belies its middling acceleration numbers. The transmission, moreover, is smooth and responsive, and its extraordinarily tall gearing (2,400 rpm at 80 mph) helps produce decent EPA fuel economy ratings of 23 mpg city/31 mpg highway and 26 mpg combined, according to the EPA.

On winding roads, the sport-tuned Koup SX feels cool and composed, with good body control and responsive steering. But the only place you'll really notice its handling edge over the Forte SX sedan is at the track — on public roads the difference is barely discernible.

And that slight handling edge comes at the expense of ride quality, as the sport-tuned Koup SX isn't just stiffer than the sedan; it's as taut as a Civic Si. Some are willing to put up with this kind of ride, but they're likely looking for more juice under the hood to go with it. In short, the Koup SX has an identity crisis — it can't decide whether it wants to be a sport compact or a sporty-looking commuter car. Hey, Kia: Crank up the horsepower or tune the ride; then we'll talk.

Comfort

On the highway, the 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX remains laudably quiet, and its almost Germanic high-speed composure lends peace of mind — until you hit a rough patch, that is, at which point sharp impacts are heard and felt. Be sure to drive the Koup SX over some broken pavement before signing on the dotted line. The leather-wrapped steering wheel isn't the nicest of its ilk, but at this price point we applaud Kia for trying. Like the sedan, the Koup lacks anything in the way of door armrest padding.

On the bright side, the supportive Koup-exclusive sport seats deserve credit for being fairly convincing riffs on the Civic Si's front chairs. The backseat, on the other hand, is about what we expect from a compact coupe. There's space back there for children and small adults, but legroom and especially headroom are at a premium. Overall, we'd deem the Forte Koup SX a supple ride away from satisfactory in the comfort department.

Function

The Forte Koup SX's gauges are always clear, and their red perimeter lighting adds visual flair without compromising functionality. The radio controls and three-knob climate-control system are idiot-proof, with the standard iPod connection drawing particular praise for its ease of use. The base stereo (there is no optional system as of this writing) is surprisingly pleasant, providing respectable clarity and full bass.

The standard Bluetooth system is greatly appreciated at this price point and even downloads your contacts list automatically, which is not a universal feature of these systems. However, it does so every time you start the car — and interrupts your song or radio program with an annoying beep and a loud "transfer complete!" announcement from a robotic female voice. Hopefully Kia will iron out this kink as the Forte's model cycle progresses.

In our real-world usability tests, the 2010 Kia Forte Koup's 12.6-cubic-foot trunk accommodated our standard golf bag and suitcase with room to spare. A rear-facing child safety seat can be wedged into the backseat, but front passengers will have to pull their seats forward to make it work.

Design/Fit and Finish

The Forte Koup SX's styling provoked much discussion among our staffers, with some comparing it to the sexy Audi A5 and others panning questionable design elements like the silver-and-black 17-inch wheels. Our overall impression was positive, and we suspect the driving public will agree.

Inside, however, the Forte Koup is afflicted by the same boring styling as the sedan. Some aspects are slightly different, including a new rubbery dash surfacing, but the overall look is far less interesting than what you'll find in a Civic Si or Scion tC. Materials quality is adequate, but we noticed a handful of rattles and buzzes in our test car, unlike the solidly constructed Forte SX sedan we tested recently.

Who Should Consider This Vehicle

The 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX should appeal to drivers who value style over speed — and don't mind that a stiff ride comes standard. Make sure you drive the competition before deciding.

Others To Consider
Honda Civic EX Coupe, Honda Civic Si Coupe, Kia Forte SX sedan, Scion tC.

The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

Model Year
2010
Make
Kia
Model
Forte
Style
Koup SX 2dr Coupe (2.4L 4cyl 5A)
Base Price
$19,390
Price as Tested
$20,090
Options on Test Vehicle
Power Sunroof With Tilt ($700).
Drive Type
Front-wheel drive
Transmission Type
Five-speed automatic
Transmission and Axle Ratio (x:1)
I = 3.939. II = 2.093, III = 1.349, IV = 0.962, V = 0.713, R = 3.347 Final = 3.099
Engine Type
Inline-4
Displacement (cc / cu-in)
2,359cc (144 cu-in)
Block/Head Material
Aluminum/aluminum
Valvetrain
Double overhead camshaft
Compression Ratio
10.5
Redline (rpm)
6,500
Horsepower (hp @ rpm)
173 @ 6,000
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)
168 @ 4,000
Brake Type (front)
Ventilated disc
Brake Type (rear)
Disc
Steering System
Speed-proportional power steering
Steering Ratio
13.4
Suspension Type (front)
MacPherson strut
Suspension Type (rear)
Torsion beam
Tire Size (front)
P215/45R17
Tire Size (rear)
P215/45R17
Tire Brand
Goodyear
Tire Model
Eagle LS2
Tire Type
All-season
Wheel Size
17-by-7 inches front and rear
Wheel Material (front/rear)
Alloy
Manufacturer Curb Weight (lb)
2,875
Curb Weight As Tested (lb)
2,919
Weight Distribution, F/R (%)
63.8
Recommended Fuel
Regular unleaded
Fuel Tank Capacity (gal)
13.7
EPA Fuel Economy (mpg)
23 city/31 highway
Edmunds Observed (mpg)
23.3

Testing Conditions

Temperature (Fahrenheit)
73.5
Humidity
12%
Elevation (ft)
2,518
Wind
1.9

Performance

0 - 30 (sec)
3.1
0 - 45 (sec)
5.5
0 - 60 (sec)
8.4
0 - 75 (sec)
12.5
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph)
16.3 @ 85.8
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec)
8.2
30 - 0 (ft)
29.29
60 - 0 (ft)
118
Braking Rating
Good
Slalom (mph)
68.5
Skid Pad Leteral acceleration (g)
0.85
Handling Rating
Good
Db @ Idle
43.2
Db @ Full Throttle
73.7
Db @ 70 mph Cruise
62.3

Tester Comments

Acceleration Comments
A little pokey off the line - either with or without wheelspin. Gear spacing seems a little wide for a small-displacement engine. Manual shifting results were identical to full auto.
Braking Comments
Nice, firm, trustworthy pedal and good fade resistance. Minimal dive and straight stops.
Handling Comments
Skid pad: Low limits and conservative tuning, but paired with decent feedback and roll stiffness, the Koup doesn't embrass itself here. Slalom: Direct steering, good roll control and enough damping control. Impressive feedback, actually. Would benefit greatly from stickier tires, but drives with good manners as is. Fun.

Specifications

Length (in)
176.4
Width (in)
69.5
Height (in)
55.1
Wheelbase (in)
104.3
Front Track (in)
61.4
Rear Track (in)
61.6
Turning Circle (ft)
35.4
Legroom, front (in)
43.6
Legroom, rear (in)
33.9
Headroom, front (in)
38.7
Headroom, rear (in)
35.3
Shoulder Room, front (in)
55.7
Shoulder Room, rear (in)
52.4
Maximum Seating Capacity
5
Cargo Volume (cu-ft)
12.6

Warranty

Bumper-to-Bumper
5 years/60,000 miles
Power Train
10 years/100,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years/100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
5 years/60,000 miles
Scheduled Maintenance
Not available

Safety

Front Airbags
Standard
Side Airbags
Standard dual front
Head Airbags
Standard front and rear
Knee Airbags
Not available
Antilock Brakes
Four-wheel ABS
Electronic Brake Enhancements
Braking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
Traction Control
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Tire-pressure monitoring
Emergency Assistance System
Not available
NHTSA Crash Test Driver
Not tested
NHTSA Crash Test Passenger
Not tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Front
Not tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Rear
Not tested
NHTSA Rollover
Not tested
IIHS Offset
Not tested
Read more

Test Drive: 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost

By: Mark Takahashi , Associate Editor www.edmunds.com

Vehicle Tested: 2010 Lincoln MKT 4dr Wagon AWD (3.5L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
Pros: Plentiful power, upscale interior, useful electronic aids, smooth and quiet ride.
Cons: Cramped third row, polarizing exterior styling, pricier and less practical than the similar Ford Flex.

You get what you pay for. In most cases, it's an adage that rings true when buying a car. We've often applauded exceptions to this rule — namely, products that deliver unexpected bang for the buck. Sadly, the 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost three-row luxury crossover, a premium version of the Ford Flex EcoBoost, is an example of the inverse. It costs far more than a comparably equipped Flex, yet delivers significantly less value.

The MKT does offer a handful of features that aren't available on the Flex, like a unique dashboard design, optional adaptive cruise control and aluminum interior trim, but none of these are game-changers. The Flex has a luxurious cabin in its own right, and its powertrains and driving character are similar to the Lincoln's. Adding potential injury to insult, the MKT's third-row seat sacrifices space in the name of style — even adults of shorter stature will hit their heads on the roof and their knees on the second-row seatbacks. The cargo bay's size and usefulness are also compromised.

What really separates the MKT from the Flex is its distinctive shape. For those who find the exterior styling of the Flex a bit too boxy for their tastes, the MKT's sculpted and tapered look may hold more appeal. Quite frankly, though, we've heard more jeers than cheers when it comes to the MKT's appearance. In the end, you pay for more than what you get with the 2010 Lincoln MKT.

  • 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost

    Part wagon, part Ford Flex and part cetacean, the 2010 Lincoln MKT is likely to enjoy only limited appeal.
    (photo by: Scott Jacobs)

  • 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost - Interior

    The MKT's interior features luxurious materials and an understated design that approaches European standards.
    (photo by: Scott Jacobs)

  • 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost - Rear

    The tapered tail gives the MKT a turtlelike appearance and also reduces cargo space and rear visibility.
    (photo by: Scott Jacobs)

Performance

The 2010 MKT comes standard with a 3.7-liter V6 that produces 268 horsepower, but our test vehicle had the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 with twin turbochargers. Rated at 355 hp and 350 pound-feet of torque, this robust engine is matched to a six-speed automatic transmission with manual shift control. All MKT EcoBoost models are all-wheel drive (the base MKT starts with front-wheel drive). The EPA estimates fuel economy at 16 mpg city/22 mpg highway and 18 mpg combined, though it's worth noting that our best highway mileage was just 17.3 mpg.

At the test track, the 4,975-pound MKT EcoBoost needed only 6.3 seconds to accelerate from zero to 60 mph, which is remarkably quick for a luxurious people hauler. Brake test results were more of a mixed bag — the first stop from 60 mph took a respectable 127 feet, but there was a significant amount of brake fade on subsequent runs. In real-world driving, the EcoBoost V6 is thoroughly impressive, providing prodigious thrust in all situations. We also like the transmission, which does an admirable job of making the most of the engine's output thanks to well-spaced gears, quick upshifts and rev-matched downshifts.

Much like the Ford Flex, the 2010 Lincoln MKT handles well for its size. The suspension is tuned for a soft, luxurious ride, but it never feels wallowy. Steering effort is feather-light but remains precise and confidence-inspiring. We wouldn't go so far as to describe the behind-the-wheel feel as carlike, though. The MKT's large proportions, heavy weight and reduced rearward visibility are constant reminders that you're driving a large vehicle.

Comfort

A wealth of power seat adjustments allows drivers to find a comfortable position whether they prefer a reclined, carlike posture or a more upright, SUV-like orientation. The MKT's low ride height and large door openings make the transition from pedestrian to passenger nearly as simple as sliding into an easy chair at home. Second-row passengers will find entry/egress as effortless as those in front, and they'll also be treated to slide-and-recline functionality, heated and cooled seats and separate rear climate controls, giving the big Lincoln a limolike quality.

Third-row passengers, however, will feel left out of the party completely. The second-row seats have a convenient one-touch fold-and-tumble button to permit access to the rear quarters, but those unfortunate souls relegated to the third row will likely have to crawl to reach their seats. Once there, passengers over 5 feet tall will probably feel as though they are testing a child safety seat. The lack of headroom, legroom and shoulder space makes these seats suitable only for children — and small ones, at that.

Passengers riding in the first two rows, therefore, are more likely to appreciate the 2010 Lincoln MKT's quiet and smooth ride. The harshness of the outside world is kept at bay with plenty of sound insulation and a compliant suspension. Wind and road noise are almost undetectable, and imperfections in the pavement are soaked up effortlessly.

Function

The MKT's small rear window and wide D-pillars — consequences of that distinctive exterior styling — would make maneuvering in reverse a nerve-racking affair were it not for the many electronic aids. Thankfully, a rearview camera is standard on all MKTs, and our test vehicle also featured the optional Active Park Assist, which essentially parallel-parks the car by itself. Forward visibility is much more favorable, with standard adaptive headlamps that light the way through turns at night.

Form also trumps function as far as cargo space is concerned, and no amount of technology can remedy this issue. The area behind the third-row seats measures a hatchbacklike 18 cubic feet, while maximum cargo space (with both rear rows folded flat) is 76 cubes. The Flex offers 20 and 83 cubic feet, respectively, and it can swallow more bulky items due to its boxy shape. Owners who regularly transport small children can breathe a bit easier, though, since the MKT easily accepts a rear-facing child safety seat in its second row.

In terms of options, our 2010 Lincoln MKT was almost fully loaded, lacking only the rear-seat entertainment system and power-folding third-row seats. The optional 14-speaker surround-sound audio system delivered clear tones, though it could stand to have stronger bass response. The physical control buttons for the audio system are on the small side and hard to read at a glance, but the Sync voice activation feature effectively eliminates this shortcoming.

The other optional bells and whistles were generally met with positive reviews as well. The blind-spot monitoring system works as advertised without being too distracting. Bundled with this system is the cross-traffic alert system, which provides audible alarms to warn of approaching vehicles while backing out of a parking space. This system works well in parking lots, but it isn't effective for traffic moving at or above boulevard speeds. All of these features, along with the adaptive cruise control, were easy to operate and never required us to consult the owner's manual for guidance.

Design/Fit and Finish

The 2010 Lincoln MKT's exterior styling tends to elicit love-it or hate-it responses. Some of our editors compared the massive grille to a feeding baleen whale, and the sloping rear end to that of a tortoise. We think that the Lincoln designers may have taken the brand's prevailing styling cues a bit too far on the MKT; however, there were a handful of occasions when it received compliments from casual observers.

The MKT's interior design is less polarizing. The dash is austere in appearance, with the waterfall center stack lending a bit of style to an otherwise plain design. Interior materials are quite good, with a majority of surfaces covered in soft-touch or additional high-quality plastics. The parts-bin buttons and knobs remind you that the MKT is indeed a Ford product, though, cheapening the overall interior execution. We're also not terribly fond of the optional aluminum trim that our test vehicle came with, as it seemed a bit gimmicky given the Lincoln's luxury leanings.

In any case, the Lincoln MKT's interior is well assembled, with tightly fitted panels and trim pieces. Squeaks and rattles were blissfully absent, even when the rear seats were folded flat for maximum cargo space.

Who Should Consider This Vehicle

The 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost is a pleasant three-row luxury crossover on its own merits, but the Ford Flex EcoBoost is a wiser choice unless you absolutely love the Lincoln's styling. The Land Rover LR4 is also a highly appealing alternative, and our test vehicle was only a few thousand dollars cheaper than a base Mercedes-Benz GL450 4MATIC, which is a superior all-around vehicle.

Others To Consider
Buick Enclave CXL2, Ford Flex Limited EcoBoost, Land Rover LR4, Mercedes-Benz GL450 4MATIC.

The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

Model Year
2010
Make
Lincoln
Model
MKT EcoBoost
Style
4dr Wagon AWD (3.5L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
Base Price
$49,995
Price as Tested
$57,970
Options on Test Vehicle
Elite Package ($4,000 -- includes THX II surround-sound stereo with DVD audio/video and 14 speakers, panoramic sunroof, blind-spot information system with cross-traffic alert, satellite radio and a hard-drive-based navigation system with Sirius Travel Link); Adaptive Cruise Control With Collision Avoidance ($1,295); Second-Row Bucket Seats ($995); Second-Row Refrigerator Console ($895); Active Park Assist ($595), Aluminum Interior Trim ($195).
Drive Type
All-wheel drive
Transmission Type
Six-speed automatic
Transmission and Axle Ratio (x:1)
I = 4.484; II = 2.872; III = 1.842; IV = 1.414; V = 1.000; VI = 0.742; Final drive = 3.16
Engine Type
Transverse-mounted twin-turbocharged V6
Displacement (cc / cu-in)
3,490cc (213 cu-in)
Block/Head Material
Aluminum/aluminum
Valvetrain
Double overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder and variable valve timing
Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Redline (rpm)
6,500
Horsepower (hp @ rpm)
355 @ 5,700
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)
350 @ 3,500
Brake Type (front)
Ventilated discs, two-piston sliding calipers
Brake Type (rear)
Ventilated discs, single-piston sliding calipers
Steering System
Electric-assist power rack-and-pinion
Steering Ratio
17.0:1
Suspension Type (front)
Independent, MacPherson struts, coil springs and stabilizer bar
Suspension Type (rear)
Independent, multilink, coil springs and stabilizer bar
Tire Size (front)
255/45R20 101V
Tire Size (rear)
255/45R20 101V
Tire Brand
Goodyear
Tire Model
Eagle RS-A
Tire Type
All-season
Wheel Material (front/rear)
Polished aluminum alloy
Manufacturer Curb Weight (lb)
5,018
Curb Weight As Tested (lb)
4,975
Weight Distribution, F/R (%)
55/45
Recommended Fuel
Premium unleaded (recommended)
Fuel Tank Capacity (gal)
18.6
EPA Fuel Economy (mpg)
16 city/22 highway
Edmunds Observed (mpg)
14.1

Testing Conditions

Temperature (Fahrenheit)
69.3
Humidity
15%
Elevation (ft)
1,121
Wind
1 mph headwind

Performance

0 - 30 (sec)
2.4
0 - 45 (sec)
4.1
0 - 60 (sec)
6.3
0 - 75 (sec)
9.1
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph)
14.5 @ 96.6
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec)
6.0
30 - 0 (ft)
31
60 - 0 (ft)
127
Braking Rating
Average
Slalom (mph)
59.6
Skid Pad Leteral acceleration (g)
0.76
Handling Rating
Average
Db @ Idle
39
Db @ Full Throttle
65
Db @ 70 mph Cruise
60

Tester Comments

Acceleration Comments
The EcoBoost V6 makes more than adequate power. Best launched in "D" because manual shifting is really just a gear-holding option for engine braking.
Braking Comments
Either this car is suffering from a serious case of "green" fade (unlikely -- it has more than 4,000 miles on the clock) or the MKT is severely under-braked. Significant fade during acceleration tests forced a break in the action to cool things down.
Handling Comments
Skid pad: Just mat the throttle and steer. The stability control can't be disabled, so there's little point in finessing it. Slalom: The MKT feels like it rolls more than a Flex, but the numbers are about the same. Non-defeat stability control intervenes strongly unless driven smoothly.

Specifications

Length (in)
207.6
Width (in)
76.0
Height (in)
67.4
Wheelbase (in)
117.9
Front Track (in)
65.4
Rear Track (in)
65.3
Turning Circle (ft)
40.7
Legroom, front (in)
41.3
Legroom, rear (in)
41.8
Legroom, 3rd row (in)
33.0
Headroom, front (in)
40.1
Headroom, rear (in)
38.8
Headroom, 3rd row (in)
33.5
Shoulder Room, front (in)
58.6
Shoulder Room, rear (in)
58.1
Shoulder Room, 3rd row (in)
49.1
Maximum Seating Capacity
6
Cargo Volume (cu-ft)
17.9
Cargo Volume, rear seats down (cu-ft)
75.9

Warranty

Bumper-to-Bumper
4 years/50,000 miles
Power Train
6 years/70,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years/Unlimited miles
Roadside Assistance
6 years/70,000 miles
Scheduled Maintenance
1 year/15,000 miles

Safety

Front Airbags
Standard
Side Airbags
Standard dual front
Head Airbags
Standard front, rear and third row
Knee Airbags
Not available
Antilock Brakes
Four-wheel ABS
Electronic Brake Enhancements
Braking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
Traction Control
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Direct tire-pressure monitoring
Emergency Assistance System
Automatic 911 dialing of owner's paired cell phone
NHTSA Crash Test Driver
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Passenger
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Front
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Rear
Not Tested
NHTSA Rollover
Not Tested
IIHS Offset
Not Tested
Read more

Rinspeed UC?


Rinspeed UC? concept

Swiss automobile creator Rinspeed will be unveiling an entire mobility concept at the Geneva motor show in March. Called the UC? - an acronym for 'Urban Commuter', which can also be interpreted as 'you see?' - the two-seat concept is powered by an electric motor and was designed for possible future series production.

The diminutive speedster measures just 2.5 meters in length and is intended to decrease gridlock in inner cities. At the same time an advanced railcar loading system will add the option to cover long distances by train, thereby avoiding traffic jams and alleviating stress. The desired mobile carport with integrated battery charging station is conveniently booked via the internet.

The lightweight vehicle is operated with a central joystick and is claimed to reach a top speed of 110 km/h. It has an operating range of 120 kilometers.

Read more

Test Drive: 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6

The Korean Ascendancy Continues

Vehicle Tested: 2011 Kia Sorento 4dr SUV AWD (3.5L 6cyl 6A)
Pros: Smooth and powerful V6, quiet and comfortable ride, commanding driving position, usable third-row seat, attractive standard features.
Cons: So-so base four-cylinder isn't a very appealing alternative to the V6.

Kia's meteoric rise to genuine respectability over the past few years has been something to behold. While GM and Chrysler were going bankrupt, this Korean upstart was busy transforming its value-centric reputation by churning out a series of all-around impressive cars. First came the likable Rondo family vehicle, and then the funky Soul hatchback, and more recently the jaw-droppingly competitive Forte economy sedan. Now Kia has turned its attention to its venerable family SUV, and at this point no one should be surprised to hear that the 2011 Kia Sorento is one of the best affordable crossovers on the planet.

Ostensibly a follow-up to Kia's outgoing body-on-frame SUV of the same name, the new Sorento is really an entirely different product, from its carlike unibody construction to its on-road-biased available all-wheel drive (the old Sorento had off-road-ready 4WD with low-range gearing). It competes in the affordable crossover segment, which has been dominated for years by two models: the Honda CR-V and the Toyota RAV4. Kia has clearly studied these icons closely, because the Sorento shares some of their most notable virtues. To wit, the Sorento's elegantly simple dashboard layout is a nod to the CR-V, and the Sorento's strong V6, third-row seat (standard on EX V6) and ample dimensions are all pages out of the RAV4's playbook.

Indeed, our initial impressions of the Sorento leave us struggling to come up with things that need improvement. There are no obvious foibles here, none of the beginner's mistakes that we'd expect from a company that only started selling cars in the U.S. in 1994. The base four-cylinder engine isn't as impressive as the rest of the vehicle, but even so, its underwhelming performance likely won't be a deal-breaker for those on a tighter budget. Kia is really making moves these days; the 2011 Kia Sorento is just the latest example.

  • 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6

    The 2011 Kia Sorento looks tougher than its predecessor but drives more like a car thanks to unibody construction.
    (photo by: Kia Motors America)

  • 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6 - Interior

    The Sorento's interior is modern and well-constructed. A two-tone interior with beige upholstery is also available.
    (photo by: Kia Motors America)

  • 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6 - Engine

    The Sorento EX V6 is the first of many applications for Kia/Hyundai's new 3.5-liter V6. It's an impressive engine — smooth and powerful.
    (photo by: Kia Motors America)

Performance

The 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6 is powered by a new 3.5-liter V6 that pumps out 273 horsepower and 247 pound-feet of torque. A six-speed automatic is the only available transmission. Our seat-of-the-pants impression is that the RAV4's V6 is still the standard-bearer in this class, but the Sorento's V6 is certainly closer to the Toyota's than to the torque-deprived Chevrolet Equinox's (223 lb-ft). This is an impressive engine, as well it should be given that it will soon be powering all manner of Kia and Hyundai products. Kia's fuel-economy estimates are impressive as well: 20 mpg city/28 mpg highway for the front-wheel-drive EX V6, and 19/27 with the optional all-wheel-drive system.

On the road, the Sorento rarely calls attention to itself, which is a recipe for success in this segment. The hydraulic power steering (thank you, Kia, for resisting the electric revolution) feels trusty and accurate, and overall handling is just fine for a family-oriented crossover — uninspiring, but safe and secure. One particularly notable element of the Sorento driving experience is its classic elevated driving position. This is a big reason why people are drawn to crossovers, and the Sorento delivers, providing a commanding view of the road ahead. All the major boxes are checked here; the Sorento is a wholly competent crossover from behind the wheel.

Comfort

On the highway, the 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6's cabin remains laudably quiet. The suspension is neither floaty nor firm, striking a pleasant balance of controlled comfort at speed. The door armrests could use more padding, a complaint we've aimed at other Kia products. The front seats are above average, though, providing consistent support even after a couple hours of driving.

The second-row seat is also praiseworthy thanks to its relatively high cushion, which is a boon for longer-legged passengers. And the EX V6's standard third-row seat (it's optional on most other trims) turns out to be a useful addition — normal-size adults can fit back there for short trips, though their knees may be in their chests, and kids should have no problem. Given the ample second-row room and the usable third-row seat, we wonder whether most families really need anything bigger than the Sorento. It's an intriguing way to save some serious money over larger, more expensive crossovers.

Function

The Sorento EX V6's gauges are easy to read, and Kia's signature red illumination adds some visual interest, though the center-stack readout won't agree with all polarized sunglasses. The standard dual-zone automatic climate control system is as simple as it gets — two big knobs, clearly marked buttons and a sensible display. Our test car lacked extra-cost options like the navigation system and Infinity stereo, but the base stereo delivers adequate sound, and inexpensive, portable navigation systems are good enough these days that we'd hesitate to pony up the extra cash for a factory setup. Standard high-tech niceties like Bluetooth and a USB port further sweeten the deal.

In real-world functionality, the 2011 Kia Sorento shines. Its 73 cubic feet of maximum cargo space is good for this class (and a whopping 9 cubes more than the Equinox has to offer), and both the second- and third-row seatbacks fold down with minimal fuss. Notably, though, there's little cargo space available with the third-row seatback in place, so owners will likely keep it folded when not in use.

Design/Fit and Finish

The Sorento's exterior styling delivers the tough SUV look that crossover shoppers seem to appreciate, though in reality the Sorento is, of course, a "soft-roader." One thing it's not is a "cute ute," even though it's priced like one. This should make it even more appealing to those who might otherwise be tempted to buy a bigger rig. Inside, the Sorento's dashboard is simple but sleek, and the subtle faux-wood trim piece that bisects it is a welcome upscale touch. The plastics are all hard, but they look good and are certainly class-competitive. Our test car was a pre-production model, yet fit and finish impressions were positive.

Who Should Consider This Vehicle

The 2011 Kia Sorento EX V6 merits consideration from all shoppers looking for an affordable crossover SUV. It drives well, can seat up to seven, gets good fuel economy and comes with plenty of standard features.

Others To Consider
Chevrolet Equinox LT V6, Honda CR-V EX, Subaru Forester 2.5 XT, Toyota RAV4 V6.

The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

Model Year
2010
Make
Kia
Model
Sorento
Style
EX V6
Base Price
$24,000 (est.)
Options on Test Vehicle
None.
Drive Type
All-wheel drive
Transmission Type
Six-speed automatic
Transmission and Axle Ratio (x:1)
I = 4.651; II = 2.831; III = 1.842; IV = 1.386; V = 1.000; VI = 0.772; R = 3.393; Final Drive = 3.195
Engine Type
V6
Displacement (cc / cu-in)
3.5 liters
Block/Head Material
Aluminum
Valvetrain
Double overhead camshaft
Compression Ratio
10.6
Redline (rpm)
6,500
Horsepower (hp @ rpm)
273 @ 6,300
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)
247 @ 5,000
Brake Type (front)
Disc
Brake Type (rear)
Disc
Steering System
Speed-proportional hydraulic-assist power steering
Steering Ratio
15.4:1
Suspension Type (front)
Independent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, stabilizer bar
Suspension Type (rear)
Independent, multilink, stabilizer bar
Tire Size (front)
P235/60R18
Tire Size (rear)
P235/60R18
Tire Type
All-season
Wheel Size
18-by-7 inches front and rear
Wheel Material (front/rear)
Alloy
Manufacturer Curb Weight (lb)
3,935
Weight Distribution, F/R (%)
61/39
Recommended Fuel
Regular unleaded
Fuel Tank Capacity (gal)
18
EPA Fuel Economy (mpg)
19 city/27 highway

Specifications

Length (in)
184.4
Width (in)
74.2
Height (in)
69.1
Wheelbase (in)
106.3
Legroom, front (in)
41.3
Legroom, rear (in)
37.6
Legroom, 3rd row (in)
Not Available
Headroom, front (in)
39.2
Headroom, rear (in)
39.2
Headroom, 3rd row (in)
Not Available
Shoulder Room, front (in)
59.3
Shoulder Room, rear (in)
58.7
Shoulder Room, 3rd row (in)
Not Available
Maximum Seating Capacity
7
Cargo Volume (cu-ft)
9.1
Cargo Volume, rear seats down (cu-ft)
73

Warranty

Bumper-to-Bumper
5 years/60,000 miles
Power Train
10 years/100,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years/100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
5 years/60,000 miles
Scheduled Maintenance
Not available

Safety

Front Airbags
Standard
Side Airbags
Standard dual front
Head Airbags
Standard front and rear
Knee Airbags
Not available
Antilock Brakes
Four-wheel ABS
Electronic Brake Enhancements
Braking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
Traction Control
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Tire-pressure monitoring
Emergency Assistance System
Not available
NHTSA Crash Test Driver
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Passenger
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Front
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Rear
Not Tested
NHTSA Rollover
Not Tested
IIHS Offset
Not Tested
Read more

Test Drive: 2010 Land Rover LR4

More Luxury and Power, Same Sense of Adventure

Vehicle Tested: 2010 Land Rover LR4 V8 4dr SUV 4WD (5.0L 8cyl 6A)
Pros: Comfortable ride, impeccable interior quality, superior off-road capabilities, spacious third-row seat, appealing price.
Cons: Questionable reliability, third row is awkward to raise and lower, a personal refueling truck may come in handy.

Slide behind the wheel of a sports car and you'll experience an overwhelming urge to break speed limits, slide around corners and accelerate away from traffic lights like there's an angry mob in the rearview mirror. Land Rovers produce a similar overwhelming urge, except this one involves spontaneous detours onto dirt lots, ski hills, the neighbor's lawn or perhaps the entire state of Wyoming. You may never quite make it to the outskirts of Cheyenne in the new 2010 Land Rover LR4, but the knowledge that you could creates a distinctive "what if" sense of excitement nonetheless.

Land Rovers have always done that. Outside of the upper-crust Range Rover, though, most of the company's vehicles have suffered from a shortage of performance and luxury for a brand considered to be among the world's elite. That includes the LR4's predecessor, the LR3, which was saddled with an overtaxed 4.4-liter V8 and a strictly utilitarian cabin ambience — acceptable when exploring the Sahara, but not so hot when compared to boulevard-cruising SUVs from Mercedes and Audi. With the redesigned LR4, however, Land Rover has refined and polished almost every aspect of the LR3, creating a well-rounded and thoroughly competitive vehicle.

A new 5.0-liter, 375-horsepower V8 helps the weighty LR4 overcome the laws of physics, while its overhauled cabin closes the formerly considerable luxury gap with the Range Rover. Not much has changed outside, but additional painted surfaces (rather than black plastic) and details inspired by the Range Rover Sport (the grille and side gills) result in a more sophisticated appearance. The brakes, on-road handling and off-road Terrain Response system have also been improved.

But perhaps the most appealing aspect of the 2010 Land Rover LR4 is that it's a relative bargain. Comparably equipped, the LR4 costs $8,000 less than an Audi Q7 4.2, $15,000 less than a Toyota Land Cruiser and a whopping $18,000 less than a Mercedes-Benz GL450. The LR4 gives nothing away in terms of luxury to those models, offers more usable passenger space than all of them, matches all but the Mercedes in performance and aces all but the Land Cruiser off the beaten path.

Only Land Rover's shaky reputation for reliability should give you pause. Otherwise, the LR4 is a champion for many more reasons than just its sense of adventure.

  • 2010 Land Rover LR4 - Action

    You may never take the Land Rover LR4 to a place like this, but isn't it cool that you could?
    (photo by: Kurt Niebuhr)

  • 2010 Land Rover LR4 - Interior

    The LR4 brings a giant splash of Range Rover to the Land Rover world. Everything looks and feels rich.
    (photo by: Kurt Niebuhr)

  • 2010 Land Rover LR4 - Action

    The adjustable suspension allows you to raise for rugged terrain or lower for your garage. Pictured is the highest off-road mode.
    (photo by: Kurt Niebuhr)

Performance

Every 2010 Land Rover LR4 is powered by a 5.0-liter V8 that produces 375 hp and 375 pound-feet of torque, which is a 75-hp and 50-lb-ft improvement, respectively, over the LR3. Attached to a six-speed automatic, it's enough to bring the LR4 up to 60 mph in 7.5 seconds — certainly competitive and not bad at all for a truck that crushes the scales at 5,751 pounds. Despite its greater horsepower, the new direct-injected V8 matches the old engine's fuel economy at 12 mpg city/17 mpg highway and 14 mpg combined. That's still pretty terrible, but not much worse than its competition.

On the road, the LR4's driving dynamics are about what you'd expect from such a tall, heavy, outback-ready vehicle — somewhat tippy around corners, but confident and composed in a straight line. All of its controls are well tuned, and there's commendable feedback through the steering wheel and brake pedal. In regard to the latter, our standard emergency stop from 60 mph measured a short 126 feet.

Off-road, the LR4 is second to none. Its air suspension allows for everything from maximal ground clearance to a pavement-hugging, garage-friendly "Approach" mode, while the Terrain Response system is easy to comprehend and supremely capable. Offering five modes represented by pictographs in the center-console-mounted control knob — General Driving, Grass/Gravel/Snow, Sand, Mud and Ruts, and Rock Crawl — this system allows the driver to select the setting best suited to the driving conditions at hand.

In treacherous low-speed downhill passes, Hill Descent Control takes over the braking duties (even in Reverse), doing a better job than the driver could by being able to brake individual wheels as required. The LR4 makes off-roading so easy that even if you buy one primarily for in-town driving, you still might want to indulge that sense of adventure once or twice.

Comfort

Despite its boxy profile and off-roading pedigree, the 2010 Land Rover LR4 is supremely quiet and comfortable at speed. Wind and road noise are surprisingly hushed, and the air suspension adapts to pavement imperfections very well. Other than its thirst for 91 octane, the LR4 is an excellent road-trip car.

An ample range of seat adjustments and a power telescoping steering wheel assure a good driving position for all. We especially like the wide, low window sill, which doubles as a perfectly placed second armrest. All seats are notably firm but provide excellent support over long distances. With its cavernous greenhouse, you'd have to be a hat-wearing Abe Lincoln not to fit in any of the LR4's three rows. Standard glass panels over each further increase the sense of airiness. Legroom is also very good, even in the third row, which benefits from a deep footwell under the second row. Indeed, no luxury SUV short of a Cadillac Escalade ESV or Lincoln Navigator L provides more spacious seven-passenger seating.

Function

Despite its surprising amount of space, the LR4's third row is a chore to raise and lower — the seatback and bottom are separate pieces and must be maneuvered individually, which requires A) walking from the tailgate to the back doors and back several times and climbing deep inside the cargo bay, or B) finding a 6-foot-10 guy to do it all from one entrance. There's also not much trunk space when the seat is up, as a pair of lateral support bars prevent anything bigger than a pair of overnight bags from fitting.

The 35/30/35-split second row likewise folds in a two-step process to assure a tall seat cushion and a perfectly flat cargo floor. The trick here is to fold each individual seat back, then pull a strap at the base of the seat and push down to make it flush with the trunk. Again, not the most elegant and easy solution, but it does result in an enormous cargo hold that tallies 90.3 cubic feet — notably more than the Benz GL-Class or Audi Q7. The LR4's tall, squared-off shape not only helps in this regard, but also provides superior visibility in all directions. Our tester's multi-angle parking camera system was also appreciated.

One of the most welcome upgrades from LR3 to LR4 is the cabin control layout. Gone is the convoluted sea of little black buttons; in its place is a simpler, more conventional layout for the stereo and climate systems. The all-new touchscreen interface isn't the best system in the world — especially for satellite radio and the iPod interface — but at least the graphics are modern and it doesn't take too long to figure out.

Design/Fit and Finish

The old LR3 had a Spartan look and feel to it, with black plastic bumpers and cabin materials that weren't befitting its price. The new LR4, on the other hand, provides almost the same upscale image and quality as the Range Rover. Materials have been greatly improved, and the switchgear feels more substantial and in general looks much richer. The exterior styling continues to evoke the LR4's boxy forefather, the Land Rover Discovery, but in a thoroughly modern way.

Who Should Consider This Vehicle

The 2010 Land Rover LR4 should be considered by anyone looking for a luxury SUV with usable seating for seven. If you frequently venture off the beaten path, the LR4 should be a no-brainer. However, Land Rover's hit-or-miss reliability reputation may cause headaches — especially off warranty.

Others To Consider
Audi Q7, BMW X5, Mercedes-Benz GL450, Toyota Land Cruiser.

The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

Model Year
2010
Make
Land Rover
Model
LR4
Style
V8 4dr SUV 4WD (5.0L 8cyl 6A)
Base Price
$47,250
Price as Tested
$54,760
Options on Test Vehicle
HSE Plus Package With Seven-Seat Comfort Package ($5,910 -- includes rearview camera, front parking sensors, automatic headlights, automatic high beams, 50/50-split third-row seats, third-row curtain airbags, rear climate controls, hard-drive navigation system, Bluetooth, ambient interior lighting, HD Radio, satellite radio, heated front windshield, heated steering wheel, heated front and second-row seats, heated windshield washer jets); Heavy Duty Package ($750 -- includes active locking rear differential and full-size spare tire with alloy wheel)
Drive Type
Four-wheel drive
Transmission Type
Six-speed automatic
Transmission and Axle Ratio (x:1)
I=4.17; II=2.34; III=1.52; IV=1.14; V=0.87; VI=0.69; R=3.4; Final=3.54; High=1.00; Low=2.93
Engine Type
V8
Displacement (cc / cu-in)
4,999cc (305 cu-in)
Block/Head Material
Aluminum
Valvetrain
Double overhead camshaft
Compression Ratio
11.5
Redline (rpm)
6,200
Horsepower (hp @ rpm)
375 @ 6,500
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)
375 @ 3,500
Brake Type (front)
Ventilated disc
Brake Type (rear)
Ventilated disc
Steering System
Power steering
Steering Ratio
Variable
Suspension Type (front)
Double wishbone
Suspension Type (rear)
Double wishbone
Tire Size (front)
255/55R19V M+S
Tire Size (rear)
255/55R19 V M+S
Tire Brand
Continental
Tire Model
4x4 Contact
Tire Type
All-terrain
Wheel Size
19-by-8 inches front and rear
Wheel Material (front/rear)
Alloy
Manufacturer Curb Weight (lb)
5,833
Curb Weight As Tested (lb)
5,751
Weight Distribution, F/R (%)
49.1/50.9
Recommended Fuel
Premium unleaded (required)
Fuel Tank Capacity (gal)
22.8
EPA Fuel Economy (mpg)
12 city/17 highway
Edmunds Observed (mpg)
13.05

Testing Conditions

Temperature (Fahrenheit)
80.69
Humidity
15%
Elevation (ft)
1,121
Wind
0

Performance

0 - 30 (sec)
2.7
0 - 45 (sec)
4.9
0 - 60 (sec)
7.5
0 - 75 (sec)
11.1
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph)
15.6 @ 90
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec)
7.3
30 - 0 (ft)
32
60 - 0 (ft)
126
Braking Rating
Good
Slalom (mph)
56.3 Stability Control on; 56.4 Stabilty Control "Off"
Skid Pad Leteral acceleration (g)
0.69 Stability Control on; 0.70 Stability Control "Off"
Handling Rating
Average
Db @ Idle
42.1
Db @ Full Throttle
65.5
Db @ 70 mph Cruise
58.0

Tester Comments

Acceleration Comments
No technique here -- just whack the gas to the floor mat. The V8 feels pretty peppy, even with the 5,700 pounds it has to motivate. Upshifts are crisp and reasonably smooth. No difference between "D" or "S" at wide-open throttle.
Braking Comments
Impressive brakes, both in terms of capability and fade resistance. Predictable and substantial forward pitch, but controlled and straight stops. Quite a lot of pedal travel, but same effort first to last stop.
Handling Comments
Predictably tall and top-heavy performance on the skid pad, where ESC keeps things from getting out of hand. Steering weight is a little much, but feel for what the front tires are experiencing is adequate. The slalom is a pretty pointless exercise in the Landie. ESC is both hyper-vigilant and (I'm guessing) rather necessary to keep all four tires in contact with the ground. Best runs were the "less is more" technique, keeping steering input and body roll minimized.

Specifications

Length (in)
190.1
Width (in)
75.4
Height (in)
74.3
Wheelbase (in)
113.6
Front Track (in)
63.2
Rear Track (in)
63.5
Turning Circle (ft)
37.6
Legroom, front (in)
42.4
Legroom, rear (in)
37.6
Legroom, 3rd row (in)
36.3
Headroom, front (in)
40.4
Headroom, rear (in)
42.4
Headroom, 3rd row (in)
40.1
Shoulder Room, front (in)
59.0
Shoulder Room, rear (in)
59.2
Shoulder Room, 3rd row (in)
42.8
Maximum Seating Capacity
7
Cargo Volume (cu-ft)
42.1
Cargo Volume, rear seats down (cu-ft)
90.3

Warranty

Bumper-to-Bumper
4 years/50,000 miles
Power Train
4 years/50,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years/Unlimited miles
Roadside Assistance
4 years/50,000 miles
Scheduled Maintenance
1 year/15,000 miles

Safety

Front Airbags
Standard
Side Airbags
Standard dual front
Head Airbags
Standard front and rear
Knee Airbags
Not available
Antilock Brakes
Four-wheel ABS
Electronic Brake Enhancements
Braking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
Traction Control
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Rollover Protection
Standard
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Tire-pressure monitoring
Emergency Assistance System
Not available
NHTSA Crash Test Driver
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Passenger
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Front
Not Tested
NHTSA Crash Test Side Rear
Not Tested
NHTSA Rollover
Not Tested
IIHS Offset
Not Tested
Read more